Before you read this, just note; I have a tendency to hate logos at first but then grow used to them. This one is no exception.
So when I first saw this... well, actually I didn't do anything. I just looked at it. Went away from it, then came back with an opinion. I've sent the images and links to Brand New (the blog) so maybe they'll run a story on this.
Anyway, this looks very basic. It's much like going through a time portal. It looks like somebody went to the 70s, designed a new logo, then came back and said "THIS WAS ALL THE RAGE BACK THEN IT WILL BE ALL THE RAGE NOW TOO 70s IS BACK IN STYLEZ!!!!!!!!!1". Well, not literally that, but to some extent.
What's really sad is that the current/old logo could replace this "new" logo and it would make all the difference. A much-needed modern update to this old 70s-style design. Oh wait, it's the other way round.
Why they would replace one of the most iconic children channels logos of all time is beyond me. Even Cartoon Network with its ever-growing pleasure to show live-action shows still manages to keep the name and have a fresh new take on its old logo every decade or so (by the looks of it anyway) based on the original design.
Ya' know, it's up there with the Disney Channel logo. All three networks have managed to take fresh new looks on their old logos, appealing to a new generation each time.
The current glossy Nick logo, bouncy CN logo, and 3D-ish DC logo types work brilliantly on print and on screen - online or offline. Why Nick needed to go to the expense of creating a boring, old-looking new logo is just thought-provoking.
One word: Why. Why?