How Far Could've The Original Run Gone?

FinnDinner

Semi-Postaholic
Joined
May 12, 2018
Messages
1,669
Points
4,486
Let's say that Stephen Hillenburg and some of the other writers never left SpongeBob after the movie. Let's say everything was exactly the same going into season 4 as it was going into season 3. What would it be like? How many seasons do you think the original run could've gone before seasonal rot? I'd say a solid six seasons would be about golden. Maybe 2 or 3 mediocre ones after that.

How many classic seasons could we have gotten?
 
I’d say maybe one, two tops before it started to adopt a tone similar to Post-Movie. I’d love for there to have been more “Classic”-style episodes, but many of the era’s writers ran out of ideas, or suffered from burnout by the end of Season 3 and went on to pursue other goals.
 
I think that they could've keep level of quality not for long, probably for one season, and tone in that season would've been similar to tone of the second half of season 3, much more cynical and mean-spirited, but, unlike many post-movie episode, comedy would've been really strong as always. Specials would've been as bad as ever, though, because I can't see pre-movie writers taking post-movie level-up in storytelling.
 
Klu said:
I think that they could've keep level of quality not for long, probably for one season, and tone in that season would've been similar to tone of the second half of season 3, much more cynical and mean-spirited, but, unlike many post-movie episode, comedy would've been really strong as always. Specials would've been as bad as ever, though, because I can't see pre-movie writers taking post-movie level-up in storytelling.
Just curious, what are your opinions on the second half of season 3?
 
Klu said:
Weaker, but still good.
Alright, also just wondering, do you think with episodes like Krabby Land, Born Again Krabs, or The Great Snail race that it was kind of entering into a more mean spirited tone?
 
FinnDinner said:
Alright, also just wondering, do you think with episodes like Krabby Land, Born Again Krabs, or The Great Snail race that it was kind of entering into a more mean spirited tone?
Yup, with them. And flanderization of Mr.Krabs. big time.
 
Klu said:
Yup, with them. And flanderization of Mr.Krabs. big time.
I could understand the flanderization if they thought it was the end of the series, but seriously you see an episode like Welcome to the Chum Bucket or Karate Choppers, just to see Born Again Krabs where he sells SpongeBob's soul without even thinking about it. Still solid half though, when they stayed to what worked.
 
Honestly, I'd say two. Things would probably start to fall apart really towards the end of Season 4, and I can imagine Season 5 (While not being as mixed as Season 5 actually is) would probably see a significant fall in quality. Noting along the level of Seasons 6-8, but I'd say it'd begin the spiral of seasonal rot around this point, given the show longevity (Think about it, Season 5 FOP is considered to be the weakest Season of the original series' run)
 
McSponge said:
Honestly, I'd say two. Things would probably start to fall apart really towards the end of Season 4, and I can imagine Season 5 (While not being as mixed as Season 5 actually is) would probably see a significant fall in quality. Noting along the level of Seasons 6-8, but I'd say it'd begin the spiral of seasonal rot around this point, given the show longevity (Think about it, Season 5 FOP is considered to be the weakest Season of the original series' run)
Yeah true, but you could look at another comedy like The Simpsons which can get like 7 solid seasons. And I question if SpongeBob could do the same. I feel as if 6-7 seasons would be the absolute max, because ignoring post-movie and on, there are still a million and a half plots left to do, and make funny like they did pre-movie.
 
Not far at all

SpongeBob would have STILL become a cash cow and the show would suffer quality-wise as a result

So probably 2 seasons
 
Mikurotoro92 said:
Not far at all

SpongeBob would have STILL become a cash cow and the show would suffer quality-wise as a result

So probably 2 seasons
You really don't think so, even if Steven Hillenburg was behind the wheel? I mean let's face it, it was already "technically" being a cash cow in the early days, it made the Nick execs a ton of money, so I don't know, I could see it going for a little while longer, just me though.

Also 100 posts! Woooooooooooo lol
 
FinnDinner said:
Yeah true, but you could look at another comedy like The Simpsons which can get like 7 solid seasons. And I question if SpongeBob could do the same. I feel as if 6-7 seasons would be the absolute max, because ignoring post-movie and on, there are still a million and a half plots left to do, and make funny like they did pre-movie.
During the span of those seven seasons, the series saw several different writers take the position of showrunner (Not to mention the writers changed plenty during that time period), and it really seemed to help keep the show fresh. The showrunners understood how to produce episodes of such quality. If the same three showrunners from the first two seasons stuck around, the series probably would've been dead by Season 5/6. The problem with Post-Movie is that the writers didn't bother trying to keep SpongeBob at the same general level of writing from the Pre-Movie era, and basically just did whatever they felt like, and while that is essentially the same writing process throughout the run of the Simpsons (I mean, how else can a series stay fresh for so long, without mixing things up?), but the overall issue I believe with botching a continuation of, really any piece of fictional media, is not keeping the characters true to themselves. Yes, the characters evolved (As they naturally should), but for a good while, they really stuck to a core, well rounded personality, really for each individual. I'm getting off topic, but without anyone to really freshen the series up (While still retaining the already established personalities of such characters), the series will really just grow stale. If the crew of Season 3 just chugged along after the movie came out, they'd be burnt out creatively by Season 5 (6, tops). The reason 9B was as excellent as it was, was because the same group of writers who had some writing role in the production of just about every episode for almost a decade (Zeus, Richard, Aaron Springer, the other Aaron) left the series to pursue future endeavors, while writers who haven't even really written for the series before (Or at least not for a long time) returned, and a creative spark occurred, with an uphill climb in overall quality. And while these writers threw in their own vision of SpongeBob into the series, they still respected the characters, keeping them really true to their original, core personalities. This respect has since been blatantly ignored in Seasons 10/11, with writers now really just doing whatever the heck they want like the Post-Movie writers did. Change is a key factor in keeping a series fresh, but keeping the ideal values of characters who're the prime focus of each story is just as important.
 
During the span of those seven seasons, the series saw several different writers take the position of showrunner (Not to mention the writers changed plenty during that time period), and it really seemed to help keep the show fresh. The showrunners understood how to produce episodes of such quality. If the same three showrunners from the first two seasons stuck around, the series probably would've been dead by Season 5/6. The problem with Post-Movie is that the writers didn't bother trying to keep SpongeBob at the same general level of writing from the Pre-Movie era, and basically just did whatever they felt like, and while that is essentially the same writing process throughout the run of the Simpsons (I mean, how else can a series stay fresh for so long, without mixing things up?), but the overall issue I believe with botching a continuation of, really any piece of fictional media, is not keeping the characters true to themselves. Yes, the characters evolved (As they naturally should), but for a good while, they really stuck to a core, well rounded personality, really for each individual. I'm getting off topic, but without anyone to really freshen the series up (While still retaining the already established personalities of such characters), the series will really just grow stale. If the crew of Season 3 just chugged along after the movie came out, they'd be burnt out creatively by Season 5 (6, tops). The reason 9B was as excellent as it was, was because the same group of writers who had some writing role in the production of just about every episode for almost a decade (Zeus, Richard, Aaron Springer, the other Aaron) left the series to pursue future endeavors, while writers who haven't even really written for the series before (Or at least not for a long time) returned, and a creative spark occurred, with an uphill climb in overall quality. And while these writers threw in their own vision of SpongeBob into the series, they still respected the characters, keeping them really true to their original, core personalities. This respect has since been blatantly ignored in Seasons 10/11, with writers now really just doing whatever the heck they want like the Post-Movie writers did. Change is a key factor in keeping a series fresh, but keeping the ideal values of characters who're the prime focus of each story is just as important.

But as you said, as long it stays through to the characters it's fine. 11 stays mostly true (aside from Patrick), with eps like The Checkup emulate a Season 1 episode. There are slip ups, but I fail to see how it is worse than any post movie Season. It just seems like your saying 9b is perfectly flawless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klu
McSponge said:
And while these writers threw in their own vision of SpongeBob into the series, they still respected the characters, keeping them really true to their original, core personalities.
Especially in "Salsa Whataverliuss", "Mutiny on Krusty", "The Fish Bowl" and "Company Picnic".
Don't get me wrong, I agree that 9B was more consistent with it's characterization, but it wasn't perfect.
And season 10/11 really botched just Patrick (and, mind, it was just fault of Kaz, since he written terribly only in his episodes) and kinda Squidward (he is screaming more than usual, but it was toned down) . And other characters, like SpongeBob, imo were written even better than in 9B.
 
Actually thinking about it, 9b didn't have the greatest track record with it's characters either. Krabs is pretty awful in Mutiny on the Krusty, and makes little sense in Salsa Whatever, Sandy is a one dimensional scientist in The Fishbowl, Squidward has his freakouts in The Fishbowl and Copybob (why people worship this episode is beyond me, it's good, but not god tier) Plankton is pretty dumb in Company Picnic, and Patrick in Salsa Whatever.....do not remind me.

Even then, eps like Food Con were retreading grounds of better episodes, Longpants I could argue was worse than Too Squarepants, and I am not particularly fond of Two Thumbs Down and Sanctuary.

It's all a matter of opinion, but imo, 9b played it too safe. Bullitan Board was about the only risk it took, and that can be fine, but than we would be following the same path that 3 and 4 took. I feel 10, and especially, 11 are the next step to make the show fresh. Episodes with background fish like Fred and Plankton's grandma as the main characters, fan favorites like Man Ray and Spot returning, more unique ideas being tested like High Sea Diving, I think 11 is similar to 5 in the amount of risks it takes.

I mean, I still stand by post sequel (all of it, not just 9b) to be solid content. Considering the depths that the show has gone on, I feel the fanbase is being a bit harsh here. While nowhere near the classic, Pie Guy said it best "it can be good in it's own way". While we will never get another Season 2, I feel the show is in good hands at the moment, and it's an accomplishment to have 3 years before a big stink bomb, conseidering post movie couldn't even go 7 episodes through...
 
hippythehippo said:
But as you said, as long it stays through to the characters it's fine. 11 stays mostly true (aside from Patrick), with eps like The Checkup emulate a Season 1 episode. There are slip ups, but I fail to see how it is worse than any post movie Season. It just seems like your saying 9b is perfectly flawless.
9B was a great example of how to freshen up a series, while remaining on track (for the most part) with keeping characters in character. I used it, because it's really the only example I have of this type of thing happening in this series. I didn't use Season 11 as an example, because it has a lot more flaws with how characters are mistreated than 9B. Yes, 9B isn't perfect, but it's one of the best versions of the series to date. As for my comparison with Seasons 10/11 and Post-Movie, that didn't mean to say they were worse than Post-Movie. What I meant was the same careless writing used to craft plenty of Post-Movie episodes (Whether bad or good) has returned in Seasons 10/11. Season 11 isn't worse than any Post-Movie Season (It could be, depending on how the remaining episodes are, this Season never fails to surprise me for better or worse). I was simply comparing the writing styles of these Seasons, not outright comparing the entire Seasons as a whole, because there's a lot more different between 10/11 and 4-9A. Also, I disagree with your example of The Checkup emulating a Season 1 episode. The premise may sound like one, yes, but it's execution is nothing along the lines of an emulation of a Season 1 episodes.

Klu said:
Especially in "Salsa Whataverliuss", "Mutiny on Krusty", "The Fish Bowl" and "Company Picnic".
Don't get me wrong, I agree that 9B was more consistent with it's characterization, but it wasn't perfect.
And season 10/11 really botched just Patrick (and, mind, it was just fault of Kaz, since he written terribly only in his episodes) and kinda Squidward (he is screaming more than usual, but it was toned down) . And other characters, like SpongeBob, imo were written even better than in 9B.
I agree, these are examples where the writers bend their character traits just to fit the plotline (Patrick has to be dumber than usual in Salsa because idiocy is the main focus of the episode, Krabs is as big of a jerk as he is in Mutiny on the Krusty because his restaurant is used as an allegory for a pirate ship, and he's represented as the ruthless captain, Patrick has to be a jerk in The Fish Bowl so there's some kind of conflict between SpongeBob/Patrick, and Squidward/Krabs have to be foolish in Company Picnic just to keep the plot moving along). Season 10 especially had the problem with Squidward, while Season 11 has an even bigger problem with Patrick, though if there is one thing I always seem to be satisfied with, it's the portrayal of SpongeBob. The current writers have nailed his personality, and pretty much in ever episode has kept him true to himself. I wouldn't call him better in 10/11 than in 9B, I see it all as equal.


hippythehippo said:
Actually thinking about it, 9b didn't have the greatest track record with it's characters either. Krabs is pretty awful in Mutiny on the Krusty, and makes little sense in Salsa Whatever, Sandy is a one dimensional scientist in The Fishbowl, Squidward has his freakouts in The Fishbowl and Copybob (why people worship this episode is beyond me, it's good, but not god tier) Plankton is pretty dumb in Company Picnic, and Patrick in Salsa Whatever.....do not remind me.

Even then, eps like Food Con were retreading grounds of better episodes, Longpants I could argue was worse than Too Squarepants, and I am not particularly fond of Two Thumbs Down and Sanctuary.

It's all a matter of opinion, but imo, 9b played it too safe. Bullitan Board was about the only risk it took, and that can be fine, but than we would be following the same path that 3 and 4 took. I feel 10, and especially, 11 are the next step to make the show fresh. Episodes with background fish like Fred and Plankton's grandma as the main characters, fan favorites like Man Ray and Spot returning, more unique ideas being tested like High Sea Diving, I think 11 is similar to 5 in the amount of risks it takes.

I mean, I still stand by post sequel (all of it, not just 9b) to be solid content. Considering the depths that the show has gone on, I feel the fanbase is being a bit harsh here. While nowhere near the classic, Pie Guy said it best "it can be good in it's own way". While we will never get another Season 2, I feel the show is in good hands at the moment, and it's an accomplishment to have 3 years before a big stink bomb, conseidering post movie couldn't even go 7 episodes through...
(See above post to explain why certain characters acted the way they did in those 9B episodes). I won't deny, there is (Especially while the season was running) a bias towards 9B. I remember when Patrick! The Game was considered one of the best of the series, then it was The Sewers of Bikini Bottom, then it was CopyBob, etc.

CopyBob DittoPants was incredibly overrated looking back, but I don't really see much praise for it nowadays. The bias did have an overshadowing effect over such episodes like Food Con (Which I agree, was practically a mix of Club SpongeBob and Pineapple Fever), though I disagree with your opinions on LongPants, I can understand the frustration with an episode that has a very similar premise to a past one.

I do disagree that 9B played it entirely safe. They experimented way more than you give it credit for, Tutor Sauce, Squid Plus One, Mall Girl Pearl, Sharks vs. Pods, The Whole Tooth, even weaker (and bad) episodes took risks like Mutiny On the Krusty. It didn't play it safe entirely, I think the writers were a lot more careful with writing the characters, but when they wanted to branch out and try new episode layouts, or focus on different, or even new characters, they went for it.

Season 10/11 is a lot more experimental than 9B, there's no denying it. One of my favorite parts about Season 11 is just how unique the episodes can be. Sometimes this works brilliant in the episodes' favor like Grandmum's the Word, High Sea Diving, and My Leg!, but it relies on how one writes the episode, and we get botched episodes like Doodle Dimension, Cuddle E. Hugs, and Pat the Horse. Season 11 is the equivalent to 5 in many ways (Heck, you could make the comparison that 9B is the first half of Season 4, 10 is the second half, and 11 is Season 5. Please, please let this similarity die before it's too late).

I agree, the current status of the series is enjoyable in it's own way. It'll never be Pre-Movie, there'll always be something different from now and then (Especially since the last Pre-Movie episode was produced over 15 years ago). I'm fully well aware how better this is from the armpit of the series, Seasons 6-8. Many just don't care for the direction the series is in, and that's perfectly fine. I don't think we're intentionally more harsh, here, I think it's all a matter of the current state of the show not being many's cup of tea.
 
Back
Top